![]() ![]() ![]() Make no mistake, police are determined to secure a conviction and imprisonment in almost all of these cases. The position of the accusedĭespite these fundamental protections, someone accused of committing a crime is in a very difficult position. If a jury thinks that there is even a possibility that someone is innocent then they must acquit. ![]() Proof beyond reasonable doubt is required. Possibly guilty, probably guilty is not enough. In a criminal trial, much more is required. In those cases 51 %, more likely than not is enough. This standard ensures that innocents are not found guilty.īRD can be distinguished from the other legal standard, the balance of probabilities. It is a serious business to decide the guilt or innocence of a man. It is the highest standard known to the law and it makes sense that this standard is applied in criminal trials. Beyond Reasonable Doubtīeyond Reasonable Doubt is the standard of proof that the prosecution must meet in criminal cases. Our society and its freedoms are built on the back of the legal system that has that principle as its foundation. The presumption of innocence is a principal of which we as a society can be proud. An accused is presumed innocent until guilt is proven beyond reasonable doubt by the prosecution. One aspect of this is the presumption of innocence. The benefit of the doubt must go to the accused. Our system is designed to protect the innocent man. Historically and by design, we as a society have chosen that if our legal system is going to go wrong it is better that no innocent person be convicted. The accusatory system means that we never have that simplistic situation where someone must prove their innocence. One of those rules is that our system is an accusatory system: those that accuse must prove. Our legal system functions under certain rules. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |